| Cosmological Models: |
|
|
|
| Friday, 20 November 2009 01:01 |
|
In modern cosmology, the different classes of Universes (open, flat or closed) are known as Friedmann universes and described by a simple equation: ![]()
In this equation, `R' represents the scale factor of the Universe (think of
it as the radius of the Universe in 4D spacetime), and H is Hubble's constant,
how fast the Universe is expanding. Everything in this equation is a constant,
i.e. to be determined from observations. These observables can be broken
down into three parts gravity (matter density), curvature and pressure or
negative
Historically, we assumed that gravity was the only important Each of these parameters can close the Universe in terms of turn-around and collapse. Instead of thinking about the various constants in real numbers, we perfer to consider the ratio of the parameter to the value that matches the critical value between open and closed Universes. For example, the density of matter exceeds the critical value, the Universe is closed. We refer to these ratios as Omega (subscript M for matter, k for curvature, Lambda for the cosmological constant). For various reasons due to the physics of the Big Bang, the sum of the various Omega must equal one. And for reasons we will see in a later lecture, the curvature Omega is expected to be zero, allowing the rest to be shared between matter and the cosmological constant. ![]() The search for the value of matter density is a much more difficult undertaking. The luminous mass of the Universe is tied up in stars. Stars are what we see when we look at a galaxy and it fairly easy to estimate the amount of mass tied up in stars, gas, planets and assorted rocks. This is contains an estimate of what is called the baryonic mass of the Universe, i.e. all the stuff made of baryons = protons and neutrons. When these numbers are caluclated it is found that W for baryons is only 0.02, a very open Universe. However, when we examine motion of objects in the Universe, we quickly realize that most of the mass of the Universe is not seen, i.e. dark matter, which makes this estimate of W to be much too low. So we must account for this dark matter in our estimate. ![]()
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email this
Hits: 126 Comments (0)
![]() Write comment
|